CRAN Package Check Results for Package fmdates

Last updated on 2021-09-26 20:49:08 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.1.4 6.94 56.67 63.61 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.1.4 5.39 41.04 46.43 ERROR
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.1.4 83.55 ERROR
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.1.4 73.33 ERROR
r-devel-windows-x86_64 0.1.4 8.00 61.00 69.00 NOTE
r-devel-windows-x86_64-gcc10-UCRT 0.1.4 NOTE
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.1.4 9.07 54.41 63.48 NOTE
r-patched-solaris-x86 0.1.4 97.80 NOTE
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.1.4 6.61 55.08 61.69 NOTE
r-release-macos-arm64 0.1.4 NOTE
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.1.4 NOTE
r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.1.4 13.00 60.00 73.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.1.4 OK
r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.1.4 31.00 59.00 90.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.1.4
Check: LazyData
Result: NOTE
     'LazyData' is specified without a 'data' directory
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-devel-windows-x86_64-gcc10-UCRT, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-patched-solaris-x86, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64

Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
     Running ‘testthat.R’ [4s/7s]
    Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
    Complete output:
     > library(testthat)
     > library(fmdates)
     >
     > test_check("fmdates")
     ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:28:3): Sydney calendar is correct ───────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:28:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:55:3): Melbourne calendar is correct ────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:55:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:84:3): NYC calendar is correct ──────────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:84:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:110:3): London calendar is correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:110:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:131:3): TARGET calendar is correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:131:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:158:3): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ──
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:158:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:187:3): Toyko calendars are correct ─────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:187:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:215:3): Zurich calendars are correct ────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:215:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:238:3): Hong Kong calendars are correct ─────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:238:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:257:3): Oslo calendars are correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:257:2
    
     [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
     Error: Test failures
     Execution halted
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc

Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
     Running ‘testthat.R’ [7s/20s]
    Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
    Complete output:
     > library(testthat)
     > library(fmdates)
     >
     > test_check("fmdates")
     ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:28:3): Sydney calendar is correct ───────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:28:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:55:3): Melbourne calendar is correct ────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:55:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:84:3): NYC calendar is correct ──────────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:84:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:110:3): London calendar is correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:110:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:131:3): TARGET calendar is correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:131:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:158:3): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ──
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:158:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:187:3): Toyko calendars are correct ─────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:187:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:215:3): Zurich calendars are correct ────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:215:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:238:3): Hong Kong calendars are correct ─────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:238:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:257:3): Oslo calendars are correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:257:2
    
     [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
     Error: Test failures
     Execution halted
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang

Version: 0.1.4
Check: tests
Result: ERROR
     Running ‘testthat.R’ [7s/15s]
    Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
    Complete output:
     > library(testthat)
     > library(fmdates)
     >
     > test_check("fmdates")
     ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:28:3): Sydney calendar is correct ───────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:28:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:55:3): Melbourne calendar is correct ────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:55:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:84:3): NYC calendar is correct ──────────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:84:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:110:3): London calendar is correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:110:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:131:3): TARGET calendar is correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:131:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:158:3): Auckland and Wellington calendars are correct ──
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:158:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:187:3): Toyko calendars are correct ─────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:187:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:215:3): Zurich calendars are correct ────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:215:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:238:3): Hong Kong calendars are correct ─────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:238:2
     ── Error (test-calendars.R:257:3): Oslo calendars are correct ──────────────────
     Error: binary + is not defined for "Date" objects
     Backtrace:
     █
     1. └─base::`+.Date`(...) test-calendars.R:257:2
    
     [ FAIL 10 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 144 ]
     Error: Test failures
     Execution halted
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc